Preface

This is a syllabus for SOC 331 @ SVSU. It may change throughout the semester. It is often considered a contract, although I don’t necessarily support that approach. However, I do base the syllabus on university policies and procedures and adhere to them whether I agree or not (and you should, too). The most common policies that I encounter during the semester are the plagiarism and grade change policies, so please become familiar with those. Here are a few other things to note:

Essentials

  • Semester: 14 May, 2012 through 30 Jun, 2012 [more info here]
  • Time/Credits: classroom // 3 credits // 16 weeks, including final exam
  • Location: ES 126 LEC TUES THUR 07:00PM 10:05PM Campus Map

Instructor

Description:

Population theory, vital phenomena, changes in populations, size and composition and their social and economic implications, national and international migrations, policies of control, techniques of estimating population projections and related matters. Prerequisite: SOC 111 or permission of instructor.

Required Material:

Optional Material (will be discussed in class):

COURSE OBJECTIVES

* Students will be expected to:

  • Access and gather demographic data from sources like the US Census and ICPSR
  • Describe and analyze features of population composition, distribution, and dynamics
  • Interpret quantitative measures that describe population and population change
  • Critically assess empirical research and theoretical perspectives to explain regional and cross-national differences in demographic outcomes
  • Communicate, orally and in writing, about the quantitative characteristics of populations and their significance
* Credit source of inspiration for objectives to the University of Utah

There are four major tasks to be accomplished:

  • 15% – Preparation of the reading for class presentation and discussion
    • During weekly meetings, each student will be assigned major responsibility for portions of the readings that we will discuss as a class.
    • Every discussion leader should prepare a 20 minutes presentation for the assigned readings, accomplishing two things in their presentation:
      • an overview of the “big questions” and related theories in the reading;
      • key issues related to data, measurement, and methods.
    • For each segment, 20 minutes will be devoted to presentation and 10 minutes to Q&A/discussion.
    • The instructor will be available throughout the week to discuss via email reading strategies and preparing for these presentations.
    • Grades will be based on class participation (handout, presentation, and discussion).
    • After the presentation, the whole class will discuss additional questions of the readings.
    • During the discussion or near the end of it I will present supplementary material to add breadth and depth to coverage of the topic.
  • 15% – Three short essays
    • The students need to submit 3 short essays of their critique of the reading/material (2-3 pages) during the whole semester.
    • These essays will be graded.
  • 20% – Midterm exam
    • The exam is a “take-home exam” (or online, if appropriate).
    • This midterm will consist of a set of 3-4 essay questions based on the course reading and lecture materials.
    • You will select two questions and write your responses that show your ability to understand and use the material.
    • Instructor reserves the right to change the midterm to include both long and short answer essays OR multiple choice and fill-in-the-blank quizzes.
    • Most often, the midterm consists of 3 separate critical article reviews and is 6 pages long
  • 50% – Research proposal and presentation
    • Research proposal should follow these general guidelines:
      • research problem is specified,
      • the literature review identifies key knowledge gaps,
      • hypotheses are stated,
      • the data are described, and
      • the analyses are outlined
    • Length: 10-12 double spaced pages
    • Format: APA style and format; check out – http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
    • We will work through the paper process together using the following deadlines:
      • Week 4 – Topic & data source, if relevant, due (TBD)
      • Week 8 – Introduction and literature review due (TBD)
      • Week 12 – Presentation of draft paper/proposal due (TBD)
      • Week 16 (Finals) – Full paper/proposal due (TBD)
      • NOTE: Dates are usually cut in half if during a summer semester, e.g. “Week 16″ becomes “Week 8″

Assessment and Timing:

Student is responsible to be aware of drop date and reimbursement pay schedule according to university policy. Student is responsible for meeting with instructor regarding progress before any deadline and throughout the semester. There will be at least one assignment graded by any initial consideration date. Student can choose to self-gauge progress but is encouraged to consult with instructor to assess competency at any point in time (for example, when deciding to stay with or drop course). Bench mark dates for term paper are outlined in course syllabus.

THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION

“Just like other people, sociologists usually have strong opinions about what is “good’ and “bad” in society and what might be done to improve conditions. However, sociologists know that their opinions are subjective. Therefore they use systematic research techniques and report their findings to other social scientists for consideration. In other words, sociologists strive to view societal issues objectively” (Don Ricker, 2010). “According to sociologist C. Wright Mills, the sociological imagination is the ability to see the social relationship between individual experiences and the larger society. It enables us to connect the private problems of individuals to public issues. Public issues are matters beyond a person’s control that originate at the regional or national level and can be solved only by collective action. In The Sociological Imagination (1959), Mills uses unemployment as an example of how people may erroneously separate personal troubles from public issues in their thinking. The unemployed individual may see his or her unemployment as a personal trouble concerning the individual, other family members and friends. However, widespread unemployment resulting from economic changes, corporate decisions (downsizing or relocating a plant abroad) or technological innovations (computers and advanced telecommunication systems displacing workers) is a public issue. The sociological imagination helps us to shift our focus to the larger social context and see how personal troubles may be related to public issues” (Don Ricker, 2010).

Reading, Writing, and Thinking in the Course

“To take charge of your own education, you must be willing to read. As you read your text, analyze and think about what you’ve read between each class and come prepared to discuss what you’ve read. You will also pursue a topic of special interest to you and write a paper [10 to 12 pages in length] about that topic. The writing of this paper will help you refine your thinking and understanding. If you do not learn to communicate in words, you cannot formulate fully developed thoughts and will instead live by the vague impressions and emotions that often substitute for ideas. If you need any assistance in selecting a topic, I will be more than willing to provide you with ideas and examples. Please do not hesitate to ask!” (Don Ricker, 2010).

Policy and Procedure

  • “Saginaw Valley State University does not discriminate based on race, religion, color, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, age, physical impairment, disability, of Vietnam-era status in the provision of education, employment and other services” (SVSU, 2012).
  • “Students with disabilities that may restrict their full participation in course activities are encouraged to meet the instructor or contact the SVSU Office of Disability Services, Curtiss 122 for assistance” (Don Ricker, 2010).

Instructor Notes

  • “NO cell phones, pagers or other electronic devices are to be heard or used during class. They are disruptive to both the class as well as your instructor” (Don Ricker, 2010).
  • “Please have the courtesy to let me know when you come into class if you must leave early on a given day. Sit close to the door so that you may leave with the least disruption to the class as possible” (Don Ricker, 2010).
  • In the event that your supplies are lost or stolen during the course of the semester, a copy of the syllabus is on my website. However, verbal changes are made to the flow of the course throughout the semester during class.
  • “If you are having trouble of any kind, PLEASE do not hesitate to see me. I am always available during office hours and my door is always open. You can also e-mail me or leave a message on my voice mail. In addition, you can make an appointment with me. I am here to help you succeed and that is my number one priority” (Don Ricker, 2010).

Tentative Class Schedule

  • Semester: 14 May, 2012 through 30 Jun, 2012 [more info here]
Detailed:
  1. DIVERSITY AND INEQUALITY AMONG POPULATIONS
    1. By Gender
    2. By Income
    3. By Age
    4. Within populations: (Gottschalk et al., 1997)
    5. Between populations: (Firebaugh, 2001; Goesling, 2000)
  2. Composition of Neighborhoods and Social Networks
    1. Individual choice and structural constraints; exercise: (Cook, 2005)
    2. Inequality among American Families with Children; read: (Western, Bloome, & Percheski, 2008)
    3. Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the schelling segregation model; read: (Clark, 1991)
  3. NEW DEVELOPMENT IN FAMILY DEMOGRAPHY
    1. What is “applied” demography? (Merrick, 1986)
    2. Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital (Astone et al., 1999)
  4. Population Processes and Social Policy Considerations
  5. [special readings]
    1. Field Trip to ES 112 Computer Lab
    2. Learn about SPSS Software
  6. POPULATION, POLITICS, AND POLICY
  7. [special readings]
    1. Field Trip to ES 112 Computer Lab
    2. Learn about ICPSR
  8. Precursors of Poor Adult Health
  9. [special readings]
  10. Causes and Consequences of Health for Children
  11. Low Fertility around the World
  12. Dynamics of Fertility Intentions
  13. Dynamics of Fertility Behavior
  14. Migration Processes
  15. [special readings]
  16. FINAL PROJECT WEEK

START OF TABLE

COURSE SCHEDULE

Week:

Topic

Textbook Chapters
(HERE
)

Assignments Due

1 DIVERSITY AND INEQUALITY AMONG POPULATIONS Syllabus -
2 Composition of Neighborhoods and Social Networks
TBD ESSAY 1
3 NEW DEVELOPMENT IN FAMILY DEMOGRAPHY 2 -
4 Population Processes and Social Policy Considerations 3
TBD
ESSAY 2
5 [special readings] 4 -
6 POPULATION, POLITICS, AND POLICY 5
TBD
ESSAY 3
7 [special readings] 6 -
8 Precursors of Poor Adult Health 7 MIDTERM DUE
9 [special readings] Enjoy! -
10 Causes and Consequences of Health for Children Article TBA -
11 Low Fertility around the World Article TBA -
12 Dynamics of Fertility Intentions -
13 Dynamics of Fertility Behavior Article TBA -
14 Migration Processes -
END Final Project Presentations n/a FINAL

END OF TABLE

Other syllabi:

Texts cited:

  • Astone, N. M., Nathanson, C. A., Schoen, R., Kim, Y. J., Astone, N. M., Nathanson, C. A., Schoen, R., et al. (1999). Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital, Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital. Population and Development Review, Population and Development Review, 25, 25(1, 1), 1, 1–31, 31. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00001.x, 10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00001.x
  • Clark, W. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the schelling segregation model. Demography, 28(1), 1–19. doi:10.2307/2061333
  • Cook, J. M. (2005). Filling Structural Holes: Social Networks in the Introductory Course. Teaching Sociology, 33(2), 170–180.
  • Firebaugh, G. (2001). The trend in between-nation income inequality. Annual review of sociology, 26, 323–339.
  • Goesling, B. (2000). Changing income inequalities within and between nations: New evidence. American sociological review, 66(5), 745–761.
  • Gottschalk, P., Gottschalk, P., Smeeding, T. M., Smeeding, T. M., Jäntti, M., Jenkins, S., Lerman, R., et al. (1997). Cross National Comparisons of Levels and Trends in Inequality. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 633–687.
  • Merrick, T. W. (1986). Teaching Applied Demography. Teaching Sociology, 14(2), 102–109. doi:10.2307/1317616
  • Western, B., Bloome, D., & Percheski, C. (2008). Inequality Among American Families with Children, 1975 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 903–920. doi:10.1177/000312240807300602